I have been working on a research project on ammunition and stopping power. The prevailing wisdom amongst the self-defense community is the larger caliber, the higher the speed, and the more fancy the bullet the better. Some people dislike 1911 pistols, because they feed very well with 230 grain ball, but may be finicky about 185 grain hollow points. From the autopsy perspective, I have personally observed that actually hitting the target is much more important than bullet type, or even bullet size. If I had to rank them, it would go hit, size, type.
But a lot of ink has been spilled on the topic, and my observations are just that, observations. They aren’t data. So, this semester I have put my minions(TM) to work, and we will be pulling autopsy charts and looking at recovered projectiles and getting some numbers that we can analyze. As I intend to publish, and there is no free lunch, I am getting in touch with several ammunition manufacturers, so see if they might be interested in sponsoring this research. Hornaday were very nice, and their voice mail system actually made me laugh out loud. Remington, on the other hand, kept me on hold for over half an hour. Not totally unexpected when you’re asking for a favour, but the Remington representatives said they usually only offered support in kind. That is, they’re willing to send me lots of ammunition (or firearms) for my study, but I then have to go shoot it myself.
As I only have three graduate students at the moment, the numbers of that study might be a too low to be really rigorous. Also, I happen to like my students very much, and even if they were willing to let me shoot them multiple times with various kinds of bullets, I don’t really want to do that. I also think my department chair, and the Dean would not approve of the study–among other folks.