William The Coroner’s Forensic Files

Thursday, 16, September, 2010

Dead Projects

Filed under: Science,Self mockery,Teaching — williamthecoroner @ 21:56

I have several projects that I have been working on for some time.  I managed to get one paper in press, and I hope it is published in the orange journal soon.  I have another that I’ve been working with a toxicologist on–my part is done, and if the other bit doesn’t get done shortly, I’m just going to publish what I have.  There comes a time when one has to get things moving.

I was working on a cross-disciplinary teaching project with two collaborators from another school.  I have piles of the raw data sitting around–in several places that are just waiting to be analyzed.  I realized, though, that I have not spoken to my collaborators in this calendar year, I think one of them is at another institution, and no one returns my emails anymore. I think this project is DOA. My time would be much better spent on getting other projects published, perhaps ones with collaborators who actually talk with me on a daily basis.

This realization was profoundly liberating.  My office will also look a whole lot neater, now.

All Linky, no Thinky

Filed under: Haterade,People who need pianos dropped on them — williamthecoroner @ 21:40

Go HERE and read.  And then go HERE and HERE

And if you cannot stand the heat, Mr. Obama, perhaps you should consider a different line of work.

Wednesday, 15, September, 2010

Graduate School #8

Filed under: Forensics,Teaching — williamthecoroner @ 16:33

Body Modification.  From piercing, branding, scarification, circumcision (male and female), circumcision reversal,  lip stretching, foot binding, tight lacing, plastic surgery, tongue splitting, implants, tooth modification, labial alterations, and cosmetic shooting.  People can think up lots and lots of ways to modify their bodies.

Monday, 13, September, 2010


Filed under: Forensics,modification,Teaching — williamthecoroner @ 20:37

Today, we explored tattoos and the wonderful world of forensics.  From the history of tattoos, how they are produced, to the (really more interesting ) psychological and sociological aspects of tattoos.  Why some tattoos are ill-advised.  Why you should not net the name of anyone except your child as a tattoo.  Just ask Johnny Depp.  What tattoos are malignant signs–and why you should never get something put on your body that you cannot read yourself.

And then, of course, there is always the T-T ratio!

Saturday, 11, September, 2010


Filed under: Circle Game,Haterade,In Memoriam — williamthecoroner @ 12:28

Do not forget.  I am in no mood to forgive, either.

Friday, 10, September, 2010

Graduate School #6 Teeth

Filed under: Forensics,Teaching — williamthecoroner @ 14:17

I.          Introduction

A.        History

B.         Natural History

C.        Why we do this

II.         History

  1. Paul Revere—identifying victim of Boston Massacre
  2. Geo. Washington

Silver and Ivory

  1. WWII

Dentist to modify O.S.S. agent’s teeth

L pills and continental fillings

III.       Natural History

A.        Hard substances, last very long time

B.         Formation

1          Teeth form from the cooperative interaction of two germ layers–ectoderm and ectomesenchyme (a neural crest derivative).

2          Enamel is formed from the ectodermal components.

3          Dentin, pulp, cementum, the supporting PDL, and bone are all derived from ectomesenchyme.

C.        Diet

1.         Better to be a hunter-gatherer

2.         Farming hard life.

D.        Baby teeth

1.         20 4 incisors, 2 cuspids, 4 molars

2.         Incisors first, (6mos) molars last (20-30 mos.)

E.         Adult teeth

1.         32 4 incisors, 2 cuspids, 2 bicuspids, 6 molars

2.         6 years to 17-24 years

F.         Don’t always follow the book

G.        Variations

1.         Size

a.         Microdontia refers to teeth that are smaller than normal. Generalized microdontia is a rare condition associated with uncommon conditions such as pituitary dwarfism. More often, microdontia is limited to just one or two teeth. “Peg-shaped” upper lateral incisors and small third molars are seen.

b.         Macrodontia refers to teeth that are larger than normal. Generalized macrodontia is rare, seen infrequently in conditions such as pituitary gigantism. It can be localized involving just one or a few teeth. Macrodontia is much less common than microdontia.

2.         Number

a.         Fewer teeth

1.         Anodontia is the congenital absence of all teeth.

2.         Edenulous is the clinical absence of teeth.

3.         True anodontia is an extremely rare occurrence.

b.         Extre  teeth

1.         Supernumerary teeth

2.         Most (90%) occur in the maxilla.

3.         Most supernumerary teeth do not erupt; they often are unknown until detected on X-ray films.

4.         Fourth molars, themselves a rare occurrence are infrequently called ‘paramolars’ or ‘distomolars.’

  1. Shape
-Dilaceration is a severe bend in the long axis of the tooth. The bend it located at the junction between the crown and the root. The bend can be as much as 90 degrees. Dilaceration usually results from trauma to the unfinished tooth when development is in progress. Such a tooth in the old literature is sometimes called a ‘hawk billed tooth’.

-Flexion is a deviation or bend restricted just to the root portion of the tooth. Usually the bend is less than 90 degrees. It may be a result of trauma to the developing tooth. Carefully contrast and compare the definitions for flexion and dilacertaion.

-Taurodontism literally means ‘bull-like teeth’. Taurodont teeth are usually molars. They have an abnormally long pulpal chamber and shortened roots. The pulp chamber has no constriction near the CEJ as do normal teeth. Clinically these teeth appear normal. Taurodontism was relatively common amongst the European Neandertals. It is also found on occasion in people living today. The implication of its appearance in modern people is unknown. No treatment of the condition is necessary apart from due prudence when doing root canal therapy.

-Dens in dente literally means ‘tooth within a tooth’. It is an uncommon developmental abnormality that primarily affects maxillary lateral incisors. It is in fact a deeply invaginated lingual pit with an important clinical implication: these are very susceptible to caries and they ought to be restored promptly. Left unattended, these teeth tend to decay very rapidly. Modern literature will often refer this condition as dens invaginatus. This is a term you should know.

-Supernumerary cusps, or as they are often called, extra cusps are occasionally found on teeth. We review here the common types.

(1) The most common one is the Carabelli Cusp which is found on the mesiolingual aspect (on the mesiolingual cusp) of maxillary first molars AND maxillary second deciduous molars.

-This occlusal landmark can appear with varying degrees of intensity either as a cusp or pit. These conditions are known collectively as the Carabelli trait. Clinically it is worth checking out during a dental exam: it is frequently a site of early dental caries. It is a heritable trait most commonly seen in European populations. The Carabelli trait is best understood as a variation, not an anomaly.

(2) A talon cusp is an extra cusp that resembles an eagle’s talon (a talon is the claw of a bird of prey). A talon cusp appears as a projection from the cingulum of incisor teeth. These can interfere with occlusion; however, grinding them down is a hazardous endeavor. Talon cusps often contain a prominent pulp horn which is very susceptible to exposure in the younger patient.

(3) Very rarely, a similar projection of enamel can occur on the occlusal surface of the premolar teeth. It forms a tubercle called a ‘dens evaginatus’. (Do not confused this with the early condition, dens invaginitus mentioned above.) Dens evaginitus can also contain a pulp horn as does the talon cusp mentioned earlier. Fortunately, these conditions are infrequent.

(4) One other variation of the upper first premolar is the ‘Uto-Aztecan’ upper premolar. It is a bulge on the buccal cusp that is only found in Native American Indians, with highest frequencies of occurrence in Arizona. The name is not a dental term; it comes from a regional linguistic division of Native American Indian language groups.

(5) Peg-sbaped lateral incisors.

(6) No discussion of ‘disturbances in shape’ is complete without mention of root variation. Certain teeth exhibit a variation in the number of roots.

Incidentally, most root variation is in the distal third of the root. Sometimes roots can be blunted or shortened. It tends to occur without apparent cause. On occasion, root resorption and root blunting can be unfortunate consequence of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. A few patients are very susceptible to this condition, and the practitioner’s heart sinks when it is found–without warning–on the post treatment X-ray films. Below is a brief discussion of extra or fused roots.

(a.) Upper first premolars usually have two roots; however, one root is occasionally found in these teeth. More rarely there are three roots.

(b.) Lower permanent canines on occasion have a bifurcation near the apex resulting in two short roots. A question about this condition has appeared frequently on Part I National Boards for dental students.

(c.) Sometimes lower first permanent molars have three roots. It is the mesial molar root that is bifurcated. Clinical articles often consider it an anomaly. It is just a variation. Three rooted lower first molars are found in greater frequency amongst North American Indians with origins in Asia.

(d.) In upper third molars, and on occasion with fused roots, second molars, the roots can be fused together. This is a variation, not a pathological condition.

Shovel shaped incisors display enhanced marginal ridges and present with a distinctive shovel-shaped appearance on the lingual aspect. They appear frequently in many persons of Asian origin, including many Native American Indians. They are especially prominent in Eskimo/Inuit who are descendants of Siberians about 4,000 years ago.

IV        Why?

A.        Clues to patient

1.         Age,

2.         Hygiene

3.         Nutrition

4.         “Meth” mouth

5.         T-T ratio

V.        Identification.

A.        Fillings

1.         Compare pre and post mortem x-rays

2.         Charts

3.         DNA

VI.       Resources

  1. http://www.forensicdentistryonline.org/

Sappy Cat Blogging

Filed under: Cat Blogging — williamthecoroner @ 08:21

It’s Friday, so it’s time for Sappy Cat Blogging.  Here’s Tinker.

Wednesday, 8, September, 2010

Graduate School #5 Osteology

Filed under: Forensics,Teaching — williamthecoroner @ 14:48

I.          Introduction

  • A.        Bone
  • B.         Species

II.         What bone is it?

  1. Skull
  2. Ribs
  3. Vertebrae
  4. Pelvis
  5. Long bones

III.       Is it human?

  1. Humans gracile
  2. Biped vs. Quadruped
    1. Pelvis
    2. Angle of the hip
    3. Angle of the elbow

IV.       Lookie-Likies

    • Deer

    Heavy long bones
    Quadrepedial hip
    Spinous processes

  1. Dog
    1. Similar long bones, not as long
    2. Quadrepedial hip
    3. Spinous processes
    4. 20-150# animal
    5. Child to small adult
  1. Cow
    1. Very heavy long bones
    2. Quadrepedial hip
    3. Spinous processes
    4. Heavy, thick ribs
    5. 1500# animal
  1. Bear
    1. Paws & gait
    2. Long bones heavy and not as long as human
    3. Similar vertebrae
    4. 150-400# animal
  1. Pig
    1. Heavy, short long bones
    2. Thick ribs
    3. 100-500# animal
  1. Sheep
    1. Snout
    2. Skull in incinerator shaft.
  1. Body Disposal
    1. Burial
    2. Cremation
    3. Sky burial
    4. Burial at sea


Filed under: modification,Social Commentary,WTF? — williamthecoroner @ 09:47

Monday, 6, September, 2010

It’s Not A Good Day of the Ground Squirrels

Filed under: Cat Blogging — williamthecoroner @ 14:39

Tinker got one chipmunk this morning.  I believe he got the left rear Achilles tendon, as the thing was limping on that side, and he was letting it climb up the tree till it just got high enough and then he pulled it down by the tail.  He did this for about an hour, and then Noodle also got into the act.  They both got bored and walked away eventually.

Later, another one pops out of the pachysandra bed right between both Tinker and Noodle, and happens to squeak.  Two heads whip around, and the stalk begins anew.  One cat would be bad enough, but when they work together, that’s bad news.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.