In Rome, one of the biggest deals one could get was to have a triumph. You got a to wear a purple toga (fancier than the ones the Senators wore) a wreath of laurel leaves in your hair. Most folks who got triumphs obtained them for military victories, so the vanquished were paraded through the streets–and thence to be sold off, you really, really didn’t want to lose to the Romans. After a sacrifice to Jupiter, there was a public feast.
On the golden chairot, though, there was a slave, whose job was to stand next to the victor and say to him once in a while “Remember that thou art mortal.”
The observation that power (wealth) corrupts is old, older even than the cliche, that’s why it is a cliche. It is not good for people to have it for too long. George HW Bush learned that lesson when he found he didn’t recognize a grocery checkout in the 1990s. Not surprising, I’m sure he hadn’t set foot in a grocery store for years. But it looked bad for the public, and really brought home to Mr. Bush how out of touch he was.
Wealth, of course, is power. Wealth changes things. I was reading recently about Bernie Kosar’s problems. He was quite wealthy, now he’s got severe financial problems, and he has difficulty with activities of daily living. Evidently, he was making sandwiches for his kids, and the only thing he had with which to cut the bread was a handsaw. CrankyLitProf thinks about the recent death of Michael Jackson, wealth, and the power of No.
The Greeks had a word for it–Hubris. People who have power get used to it. Then they get used for it, and sometimes go down the primrose path. It is particularly dangerous when people start enjoying telling people what to do. Power is fleeting, and if you no longer control resources, one’s power dries up. Diocletian was able to retire to tend his cabbages, but he was in the minority. Napoleon’s fate is more likely.
Update: Jonah does it better than I.
Priorities and proportionality
Bernard Madoff was sentenced to 150 years in prison. Barring any act of clemency, this pretty much guarantees that Mr. Madoff will die in prison. At the hearing, the judge commented:
I’ve been involved with trials many times in my career. In Ohio, if one individual kills another with malice aforethought, or while in the commission of another crime, that is aggravated murder. One will be able to face the parole board in twenty-three years. It used to be less. I recall one defendant who was facing a second “life” sentence, he’d gotten out of his first “life” sentence after twelve years behind bars.
Now, I do believe the courts and society have gotten stricter since that gentleman was sentenced the first time. Probably a good thing. And I do not wish to argue that Mr. Madoff doesn’t need to suffer some consequences. After all, he made off (as it were) with a lot of people’s money. But he did not do it alone. He was operating for years, and I am sure people turned a blind eye to his machinations, either because they were paid off or people were making too much money to want to derail the gravy train.
The sentencing sends a message, alright. One of the messages it sends is that money is more important than people. To be hurt by Bernie Madoff one had to be both incredibly wealthy–the average Joe couldn’t have invested with him directly– and incredibly imprudent. The rates of return were out of porportion to the risks of the investments. The wealth of his victims is irrelevant. The collusion of his victims is relevant.
Dr. Helen asks a very cogent question. To wit: Why is a swindler, who committed a property crime with no violence receiving a punishment greater than those who rape and take human lives? Madoff is a Dictyostelium, to be sure. There need to be consequences for his actions. I was taught growing up that people were more important than things. As a society, what are our values?